https://genezini.com/tags/devops/Recent content in DevOps on Daniel GeneziniHugo -- gohugo.ioen-us2022 Daniel Genezini All rights reservedTue, 29 Nov 2022 08:20:00 -0300https://genezini.com/blog/p/keep-your-diagrams-updated-with-continuous-delivery/Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:20:00 -0300https://genezini.com/blog/p/keep-your-diagrams-updated-with-continuous-delivery/<img src="https://genezini.com/blog/p/keep-your-diagrams-updated-with-continuous-delivery/cover.jpg" alt="Featured image of post Keep your diagrams updated with continuous delivery" /> Changing software diagrams is hard. The simple act of adding a new box may require us to drag all the existing boxes and reorganize the diagram. This is one of the main reasons to why software diagrams are constantly left deprecated after the first stages of the development process. In this post I'll show how defining diagrams as code can help in designing and updating software diagrams, and how to automate the process of updating the documentation with those diagrams.https://genezini.com/blog/p/cleaner-representation-of-software-architectures-with-the-c4-model/Tue, 22 Nov 2022 05:45:00 -0300https://genezini.com/blog/p/cleaner-representation-of-software-architectures-with-the-c4-model/<img src="https://genezini.com/blog/p/cleaner-representation-of-software-architectures-with-the-c4-model/cover.jpg" alt="Featured image of post Cleaner representation of software architectures with the C4 Model" /> Diagrams are a great way to visually communicate something. However, the majority of software architecture diagrams don't really express what they intend to, lacking description of its elements and with lots of implicit notations only understood by who drew the diagram. Also, they try to express more than one vision (high level, infrastructure, flow order, etc) in only one diagram, making it even harder for non technical people or people outside the project to understand. In this post, I'll present the C4 model and how it can produce software architecture diagrams that are inclusive to non-technical people, easier to understand and, consequently, better to document our software systems.https://genezini.com/blog/p/analyzing-and-enforcing-.net-code-coverage-with-coverlet/Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:10:00 -0300https://genezini.com/blog/p/analyzing-and-enforcing-.net-code-coverage-with-coverlet/<img src="https://genezini.com/blog/p/analyzing-and-enforcing-.net-code-coverage-with-coverlet/cover.png" alt="Featured image of post Analyzing and enforcing .NET code coverage with coverlet" /> Automated software tests are a requirement for ensuring we are delivering a product with quality to our users. It helps in finding bugs and requirements not fulfilled at development time, but also decreases the cost of maintenance by making the future changes to our code safer. Besides, the act of writing testable code alone increases the quality of the code we are writing because testable code has to be decoupled. In this last post of this series, I'll show how to analyze and enforce a minimum code coverage in our applications, and how to use integration tests to increase our testing surface.https://genezini.com/blog/p/enforcing-.net-code-style-rules-at-compile-time/Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:00:00 -0300https://genezini.com/blog/p/enforcing-.net-code-style-rules-at-compile-time/<img src="https://genezini.com/blog/p/enforcing-.net-code-style-rules-at-compile-time/cover.png" alt="Featured image of post Enforcing .NET code style rules at compile time" /> Static code analysis is a great tool for spotting some kinds of error in your code, for example, not disposing of objects that implement IDisposable. Also, it helps to enforce and validate if the code written is following a defined standard, for example, using PascalCase for class names and camelCase for parameter names. In this post I'll show how to use Roslyn Analyzers with C# to enforce some standards of code quality and code style on your code, throwing errors at compile time if any rules are not being respected and not allowing the code to be pushed to protected branches of the repository.